Ok fine. I'm not a bible scholar. I'm one who comments on the politics of the day. It seems JRK is correct that the section of Deuteronomy refers to a case of adultry being put to death. I only pulled up a google search without reading the whole thing. Whatever. Mistakes happen. It did seem weird to me though to say that the bible calls for death for an ordinary premarital sex, as disallowed as it is, I should have read it better. I was under the assumption that it was the only way to do disease prevention in such an early age of history; but then again I'm glad it's not the case.
Wow it's been forever since I've been to a Jewish Torah study, like years. I'm inherently distrustful of jewish interpretations after learning that don't cook a calf in its mothers milk = total separation of meat and dairy & that fire = electricity.
However where JRK went wrong is she tied to take it even further and say that premarital sex isn't even disallowed at all "ooooooooooooooooooooooh see the penalty for premarital sex is marriage" ya sure that's only if it's with the intent of marriage otherwise it's disallowed.
Oh and because I told her to go back to her kitchen, the bitch wrote on her blog that I'm a misogynist. XD I can assure you the reader, I am the exact opposite of a misogynist. XD
With the style that JRK argues, I am certain that I am not the first person to want to drop her an F-bomb, but since she came to my blog and I'll curse when I want to curse.
I am now going to argue in slippery lawyer style like JRK and say I didn't really drop her an f-bomb because I used it as a verb that she should fuck off (go away) instead of using the f word as an adjective to her. XD