Monday, March 15, 2010

Profound Passover Question

When did matzah become matzo? O.O


By the wah Yehuda MatZAHs are suprisingly decent as I just had one today O.O but still matzah isn't the first food I'd go for. After all, the purpose of matzah was to emulate life being made more difficult in the first place.

Chabad's cardboard matzahs made me hate Passover. XD

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I had this idea for a while without any real research striking.but just an impression I had form similarities and connections between the two movements. And then I saw a book of collected papers by gershom sholem and it contained some writing from some later false prophets of the shabatai tzvi movement and the parallels to chasidut were
lubavitch)is a virulent poisonous stream of yidsihkeit ).

. I have has a theory for a while that chasidut is just the same essence of evil as the movement of the shatz. Yet I still feel there good and sincere people within that movement. But I feel the movement itself contained some deep evil that the followers were not aware of. I can understand why things like chabad would turn you off to Torah. I think a lot depends on one personal experience in life. I have has a theory for a while that chasidut is just the same essence of evil as the movement of the shatz. Yet I still feel there good and sincere people within that movement. But I feel the movement itself contained some deep evil that the followers were not aware of.

Anonymous said...

sorry about the previous un-edited note. This is what i meant to write



Lubavitch is a virulent poisonous stream of yidsihkeit
I have has a theory
That chasidut is just the same essence of evil as the movement of the shatz. Yet I still feel there good and sincere people within that movement. But I feel the movement itself contained some deep evil that the followers were not aware of. I can understand why things like chabad would turn you off to Torah. I think a lot depends on one personal experience in life. I have has a theory for a while that chasidut is just the same essence of evil as the movement of the shatz. Yet I still feel there good and sincere people within that movement. But I feel the movement itself contained some deep evil that the followers were not aware of.
I had this idea for a while without any real research striking.but just an impression I had form similarities and connections between the two movements. And then I saw a book of collected papers by gershom sholem and it contained some writing from some later false prophets of the shabatai tzvi movement and the parallels to chasidut were

SJ said...

It wasn't chabad who played thee major role of turning me off to orthodox judaism, rather it was the nonhassidic orthodox and the fact that noone could answer questions and that almost all of the halachot are major stretches of what the p'shat of the Torah actually says.


Chabad was just pimping their matzot to my family and I hate their matzot, you know the big circular ones that come in the big boxes.


Uuum, I'm not sure I'd call chabad evil; but certainly they're deceptive since they liiiiie to hide their messianism.

leto said...

Non Chasidic Judaism also has a certain amount of problems. i never had a name for it until I saw it in one book. The author calls it "Maharil"ism. He calls it every man's busy body. Now days you could call it "Mishna Brura"ism.
But to be on topic the trouble with non Chasidic Judaism today is Mahrilism and kiruvism.
But let me make it clear that the problem with mahrilism is not busybody aspect of it. It is rather the lack of logical rigor. The shoddy sloppy thinking of the achronim is a least one major problem with all yidsihkeit ever since the Rambam (with a few notable exceptions (pnei yeshoshu and especially the marsha))
The other kelipa is kiruvism which you obviously know more about than me. But the blatant dishonesty is certainly more alarming than maharilism