Thursday, August 27, 2009

Obama's Poll Numbers

Obama's poll numbers are going down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down down.







Obama's stimulus was supposed to stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate stimulate







The economy and we got the exact opposite effect, the unemployment rate for the USA was at 9.7% in July 2009 higher than it ever was in the Bush years so basically all of those billions of dollars Obama spent on "stimulus" was wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted wasted.



How much money exactly did Obama and the democrats waste? Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions. Billions.




Make no mistake, a real stimulus is supposed to reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce reduce unemployment.



During the Clinton years and even for most of the George W. Bush years between 9/11 and the recent financial crisis, unemployment was generally going down except for little spikes upwards and downwards. During the Reagan years the unemployment rate shot up at the first term then somwhat came down and at the second term back down agan and continued to decrease during the term of George HW Bush.



So when economists speak of a "jobless recovery," they are giving the public a song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance song and dance.



A jobless recovery means that the government's economic policy isn't stimulating the right stuff. Obama and the democrats aren't stimulaing the right stuff. If Reagan and George HW Bush can do it, why not Harvard Graduate Barak Hussein Obama?





If the stimulus spending were to have worked, it should have began to work right away. What kind of economy fix up fucks things up even worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse worse before it gets better? It don't make any sense.





Obama and the congressional democrats seems to have defrauded the American public of hundreds of billions of dollars.

2 comments:

Garnel Ironheart said...

Sadfly I agree with you on this.

The economic cycle happens no matter what governments do. Government can make a boom more prosperous than it might otherwise have been, or it can worsen and prolong an recession, but the boom and bust would have happened anyway. The true secret to success in politics is to get elected just as the boom hits and not to have an election just as the recession starts.
For example, Bush I was elected during the Reagan boom and lost to Clinton during the 1992 recession, neither of which he had any control over.
Obama, in his arrgance, tried to mess with this using massive government spending but forgot that government money does not stimulate the economy. Private money does because it leads to the production of goods and services people actually use. If no one is buying GM's cars, then GM should go bust,not be propped up to continue producing cars no one will still buy.
However, don't be too gleeful. We're not even at mid-term yet. Popularity numbers mean nothing until the 2012 campaign starts.

SJ said...

Obama isn't going to solve anything -.-