Friday, August 15, 2008

Tales of A Loser

Ok so this loser names Shlomo goes to the www.Kvetcher.net blog and says:

"SJ you wouldnt be invited [to the nbn bloggers convention] because you are a bad blogger and cant make a cohesive argument."

so I say "That’ s funny. Click here for "Well, I’m convinced. He [SJ] pointed out our errors, rationally and convincingly. I’m considering becoming irreligious right now” in the comments section."

and he said "omg are you a moron? SJ that’s called sarcasm! he was making fun of you!
I also find it humorous that you have to point to ONE comment in the comment section of a random blog as the ONLY evidence that you don’t suck"

to which I answered "
Shlomo,
1) He closed his orthodox freelancers blog and started a freelancers blog in general writing that his views are not necsessarily the same
2) My ratings on israelforum.com are pretty good.
you are just mad that someone disagreed with orthodox judaism, it is sad that you are not straightforward about this fact but frankly it does not fool me."

The point is that the stalinist Shlomo was writing me off as "a bad blogger" without being straightforward about him disliking how I disagreed with orthodox judaism. To him, anyone who disagrees with his cult orthodox judaism is "a bad blogger."

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

SO anyone who thinks you are a bad blogger is because they are "Stalinist" and because they think you are attacking orthodoxy?

Funny DK attacks orthodoxy all the time and I didn't see him calling DK a bad blogger.

I'm NOT saying you are a bad blogger, but your assumption doesn't make a lot of sense. I'm sure there are people who think I'm not a good blogger but I don't assume its because they disagree with my views. That just doesn't make sense logically unless you have other reasons to back it up. I think this post alone is more evidence of why he thinks you cant make a cohesive argument. people have their opinions and are entitled to them and they DONT always have to do with your views on orthodoxy

SJ said...

>> Funny DK attacks orthodoxy all the time and I didn't see him calling DK a bad blogger.

what he did not say and what he thinks are two separate things.

>> your assumption doesn't make a lot of sense.

moron, the dude is orthodox and he is saying that I suck without saying the real reason why he dislikes my blog.

Anonymous said...

I feel bad for you. :-(

No need to continue to embarrass yourself.

Please... stop making a fool of yourself.

Baruch said...

Shlomo's right. I was being sarcastic. I started a new blog because I've moved to Miami and don't have time to keep up the OFG. I said my views weren't necessarily the same because some of the older stuff on the blog I've changed my mind about and I'm open to changing my mind about the newer stuff too.

Anonymous said...

so he was being sarcastic.....

i guess that means that his sarcasm was only because u attacked orthodox people

SJ said...

>> Shlomo's right. I was being sarcastic.


my ratings on israelforum.com are still good.

Anonymous said...

define good. You dont even have a single posting in the 100's.
Your arch nemesis Factual Basis has a bunch in the 100's and he has been posting for only a month or so.

SJ said...

>> Your arch nemesis Factual Basis has a bunch in the 100's and he has been posting for only a month or so.

it is easy for factual basis because all he does is repeat the party line and does not come up with any of his own original thoughts.

SJ said...

>> Your arch nemesis Factual Basis has a bunch in the 100's and he has been posting for only a month or so.

it is easy for factual basis because all he does is repeat the party line and does not come up with any of his own original thoughts.

Anonymous said...

"I'm a rebel...just like everyone else"

Right SJ?

Pathetic. Fess up, you suck and cant come to gripes with the fact that you do. Its excuse after excuse. First it's "look this guy agreed with me" then when its shown that he was being sarcastic its "look at my ratings" then when its shown that those aren't that high its "im not as popular because i speak against the grain"...excuses excuses. Why not try and get better rather then trying to find excuses for why no one is impressed with you. (btw very impressive ONE rating on that post of yours about Pravda. Guess you REALLY hit the mark with that one!)

If FB was really only repeating what has been said people would see through that and rate him poorly, rather he gets very good ratings...are you saying people are stupid or are you wrong again

Anonymous said...

Commentators,

Stop picking on the poor kid. He obviously has serious psychological issues.

SJ,
You should seriously consider seeing a psychiatrist or seeking some kind of therapy. Look it up in your yellow pages. There's no shame in getting help when it's needed.

Anonymous said...

i dont think he has problems. I just think he stupid (and YES I AM CALLING YOU A NAME!!!)

SJ said...

You guys are having a whole lot of fun being critical of me, too bad you can't criticize your own selves without being branded as heretics and shunned.

Anonymous said...

awwww poor baby

Anonymous said...

Wow SJ, kind of makes you pine for the days when only I made fun of you, doesn't it.

SJ said...

naaa Garnel, because I know that these losers don't have the balls to criticize a particular aspect of their beliefs or practices in their own community, even as an experiment to see what happens.